#中国历史研究院课题组

Live, measured metrics for the hashtag #中国历史研究院课题组 from the open social web. Every number carries a named source and the time it was fetched. Nothing is estimated.

hashtag.org network · sponsored

Own #中国历史研究院课题组

This #name is available to claim. It becomes your portal on the open agent web: this very page, a keyword you rank for by an open public stake, and a verifiable identity for AI agents. Nobody else sells a page like this for every #name.

$23.52/ year · 10-character #name
0
Uses / 7 days
Mastodon
0
Accounts / 7 days
Mastodon
4
Recent posts
Mastodon
~0/hr
Recent pace
Mastodon · last 4
0
Avg reactions / post
Mastodon · last 4
Reddit posts / month
Reddit search
Open-web mentions
hashtag.org Firehose

Day-by-day usage

measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public tags API) · fetched 2026-08-23 22:12 UTC
0
08-17
0
08-18
0
08-19
0
08-20
0
08-21
0
08-22
0
08-23

0 uses by 0 unique accounts across the window. Real per-day counts, not estimates. Newest bar is today so far.

Related hashtags

measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public search API) · fetched 2026-08-23 22:12 UTC

No related tags with measured usage found for #中国历史研究院课题组.

Live pulse

measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon tag timeline) · fetched 2026-08-23 22:12 UTC

Everything below is measured over the latest 4 public posts (spanning ~3409 hours).

Top of the latest posts

  • #修木:认定明清“闭关锁国”的人,你们才是“闭观锁国” 2023-01-16 观察者网 https://www.guancha.cn/XiuMu/2023_01_16_676067_s.shtml 早几个月,《#历史研究》登出一篇文章[1],质疑用“#闭关锁国”这个概念来描述明清时的中国是否合适。 本文将介绍十八世纪中国的#对外贸易,算是换一个角度,从国外的#历史记录与研究,看看在对外贸易特别是#海洋贸易 上,中国算不算“闭关锁国”。 ——+——+——+——+—— #中国历史

    好好引用@[email protected]012023-01-16 04:01 UTCView post →
  • 无论闭关锁国还是自主限关,都是专制统治者剥夺民众的自由 张弘 中图网燕京书评 2022-09-15 https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/HsBDm7of1y6W5AqTfYYDQg 前不久,《#历史研究》杂志发表#中国历史研究院课题组 的《#明清时期“#闭关锁国”问题新探》一文,经#中国历史研究院 公号发布之后,很快引发了多位网友的激烈争论。 长期以来,无论是#历史教科书 还是主流的#明清史研究,都认为明清两代闭关锁国。一定程度上,这已经成为被民众普遍接受的

    好好引用@[email protected]002022-09-16 10:23 UTCView post →
  • 批驳历史研究院“闭国锁国有利论” 我就是郁风 2022-08-28 https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/3TfaA6ZkD9y3FcEhkQyi4Q 近日,一篇名为《#中国历史研究院课题组:#明清时期“#闭关锁国”问题新探》的文章在网上热传。文章的结论是,传统“闭关锁国导致中国近代落后”的观点是过时的、站不住脚的,是“特定时代#欧洲中心主义 影响下的文化产物”。 恰恰相反,该政策起到过反侵略、反#殖民、反#海外敌对势力 干涉、反#文化渗透 的积极作用。 文章

    好好引用@[email protected]002022-08-29 12:13 UTCView post →

#中国历史研究院课题组 across platforms

every network with a public tag surface

Follow #中国历史研究院课题组 straight to each platform’s own tag page. Where a platform publishes open data we measure it above; the rest lock their numbers behind paid APIs, so we link rather than guess.

Every number above is measured from a named public API at the shown fetch time. Nothing is estimated or extrapolated. Platforms that lock their data behind paid APIs are not shown. Agents: the same numbers, as JSON, at /api/hashtags/中国历史研究院课题组