#核廢料

Live, measured metrics for the hashtag #核廢料 from the open social web. Every number carries a named source and the time it was fetched. Nothing is estimated.

hashtag.org network · sponsored

Own #核廢料

This #name is available to claim. It becomes your portal on the open agent web: this very page, a keyword you rank for by an open public stake, and a verifiable identity for AI agents. Nobody else sells a page like this for every #name.

$5,313.74/ year · 3-character #name
Claim #核廢料 — $5,313.74/yr→Buy on hashtag.space (web3)
card via hashtag.org · tokens via hashtag.space
0
Uses / 7 days
Mastodon
0
Accounts / 7 days
Mastodon
4
Recent posts
Mastodon
~0/hr
Recent pace
Mastodon · last 4
0
Avg reactions / post
Mastodon · last 4
—
Reddit posts / month
Reddit search
—
Open-web mentions
hashtag.org Firehose

Day-by-day usage

measured · mastodon.online (Mastodon public tags API) · fetched 2026-08-24 15:54 UTC
0
08-18
0
08-19
0
08-20
0
08-21
0
08-22
0
08-23
0
08-24

0 uses by 0 unique accounts across the window. Real per-day counts, not estimates. Newest bar is today so far.

Related hashtags

measured · mastodon.online (Mastodon public search API) · fetched 2026-08-24 15:54 UTC

No related tags with measured usage found for #核廢料.

Live pulse

measured · mastodon.online (Mastodon tag timeline) · fetched 2026-08-24 15:54 UTC

Everything below is measured over the latest 4 public posts (spanning ~9912 hours).

Posting hours (UTC)

00:0012:0023:00

Languages: Chinese (Taiwan) (3)

Avg boosts / post: 0.3

Top of the latest posts

  • 最近偶而會聽到一些討論是先丟結論「只能焚化爐跟掩埋場二選一」、「不要焚化爐就得乖乖接受掩埋場」，是還處於傳統線性經濟的思維嗎，特徵有： 1. 垃圾產生量越多，表示經濟的動能越強，不算是個問題，不需要減量； 2. 垃圾就是垃圾，沒有回收價值，垃圾最好消失於天地，不該回到經濟系統中。 因此從古至今一直運作的線性經濟系統中，掩埋場跟焚化爐可說是垃圾處理的標配。 循環經濟的觀點： 1. 經濟動能跟垃圾產生量並不成正比，而是跟資源回收率成正比。 2. 將垃圾中的物質視為有價資源，盡可能

    看守台灣協會@[email protected]♥ 0↻ 02026-03-25 12:03 UTCView post →

  • 好快 XD quote : 「 #核廢料 儲存地點是發展 #核電 的基本要件，但台灣民眾對於核能長期存有恐懼。此次 #公投，贊成（同意） #重啟核三 的都是高度理性思考的公民，政府將核廢料儲存在贊成率（同意率）最高的縣市，這些地區不會出現太多反對聲音，非常有利核能政策的推動」 https://www.taisounds.com/news/content/71/209719

    ijliao@[email protected]♥ 0↻ 02025-08-25 09:36 UTCView post →

  • 【重啟核三公投電視說明會3】甘崇緯：節電能省下一座核三，黃士修：核廢料絲毫不影響我們生活 陳家儀 2025-08-11 20:43:00 CST重啟核三公投說明會第三場於8月11日舉行，正方代表核能流言終結者創辦人黃士修與反方代表為台灣綠黨共同召集人甘崇緯提出哪些不同的論述呢？ 核電符合歐盟綠色能源標準嗎？核電廠耐震且符合國際趨勢嗎？戰時核電廠的角色為何？讓《關鍵評論網》一次為您回顧！ https://www.thenewslens.com/article/257064 #公

    The News Lens@[email protected]♥ 0↻ 12025-08-11 13:15 UTCView post →

#核廢料 across platforms

every network with a public tag surface

Follow #核廢料 straight to each platform’s own tag page. Where a platform publishes open data we measure it above; the rest lock their numbers behind paid APIs, so we link rather than guess.

X (Twitter) ↗Instagram ↗TikTok ↗Facebook ↗LinkedIn ↗YouTube ↗Threads ↗Bluesky ↗Mastodon ↗Reddit ↗Pinterest ↗Tumblr ↗

Every number above is measured from a named public API at the shown fetch time. Nothing is estimated or extrapolated. Platforms that lock their data behind paid APIs are not shown. Agents: the same numbers, as JSON, at /api/hashtags/核廢料