#著作权

Live, measured metrics for the hashtag #著作权 from the open social web. Every number carries a named source and the time it was fetched. Nothing is estimated.

hashtag.org network · sponsored

Own #著作权

This #name is available to claim. It becomes your portal on the open agent web: this very page, a keyword you rank for by an open public stake, and a verifiable identity for AI agents. Nobody else sells a page like this for every #name.

$5,313.74/ year · 3-character #name
Claim #著作权$5,313.74/yrBuy on hashtag.space (web3)
card via hashtag.org · tokens via hashtag.space
0
Uses / 7 days
Mastodon
0
Accounts / 7 days
Mastodon
3
Recent posts
Mastodon
~0/hr
Recent pace
Mastodon · last 3
0
Avg reactions / post
Mastodon · last 3
Reddit posts / month
Reddit search
Open-web mentions
hashtag.org Firehose

Day-by-day usage

measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public tags API) · fetched 2026-08-25 01:23 UTC
0
08-19
0
08-20
0
08-21
0
08-22
0
08-23
0
08-24
0
08-25

0 uses by 0 unique accounts across the window. Real per-day counts, not estimates. Newest bar is today so far.

Related hashtags

measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public search API) · fetched 2026-08-25 01:23 UTC

Live pulse

measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon tag timeline) · fetched 2026-08-25 01:23 UTC

Everything below is measured over the latest 3 public posts (spanning ~35937 hours).

Top of the latest posts

  • ↑ 再有 #databaserights 只定义了数据库本身【可以】纳入版权法保护,并没有任何对数据库资料来源与数据库自身合法性关系的判定,因此数据库【可能】作为知识创造受版权法保护不代表未经许可的数据库编篡行为就一定违法,两者没有逻辑关系无法进行任何推导 而PRC的汇编作品保护也仅仅指出了「行使著作权时」作为限定条件,如果这次是RSS数据库指控博客原作者侵犯自己汇编著作权那自然可以套用,但对方并未做出如此指控吧? 最后 法律上的 #毒树之果 并不适用于 #著作权,典型的例子

    杂食型蓑白(赛里斯地区的形态)@[email protected]002025-01-24 11:20 UTCView post →
  • 馮睎乾十三維度 2023-06-19 https://www.facebook.com/epinoia2020/posts/594312226156077 #林夕 #陈奕迅 #署名权 #著作权 #知识产权 比「改名」更屈辱的「改詞」 關心#林夕 的讀者來訊,他怕夕爺情緒不佳,希望我打電話開解他。坦白說,我知道林夕不會為此困擾,所以沒想過要「開解」——打擾夕爺看BTS或寫字的雅興,我就罪該萬死了——但恰巧有其他事要談,這天也真的跟他通了一次電話,不免聊起「改名」風波。 為了讓夕

    好好引用@[email protected]002023-06-21 01:18 UTCView post →
  • 我觉得这并不是victim blaming,而是在#审查 的干预下,简中用户对于「#社群」、对「#网络」、对于「#公开」的定义,已经与正常#互联网 的定义渐行渐远了 正常互联网上,在尊重#著作权 的前提下的转载是被默许的,因为发布行为本身就包含了对「公开」的许可 但简中用户认为「公开」的发布,是「可以被少部分用户看见但不被审查系统看见」,因此当内容被扩散到发布者认为的「审查系统可以看见」的范围时会感觉到被侵犯 但问题是,「可以被少部分用户看见但不被审查系统看见」这一假设本身真

    杂食型蓑白(赛里斯地区的形态)@[email protected]022020-12-19 02:28 UTCView post →

#著作权 across platforms

every network with a public tag surface

Follow #著作权 straight to each platform’s own tag page. Where a platform publishes open data we measure it above; the rest lock their numbers behind paid APIs, so we link rather than guess.

Every number above is measured from a named public API at the shown fetch time. Nothing is estimated or extrapolated. Platforms that lock their data behind paid APIs are not shown. Agents: the same numbers, as JSON, at /api/hashtags/著作权