#著作权法

Live, measured metrics for the hashtag #著作权法 from the open social web. Every number carries a named source and the time it was fetched. Nothing is estimated.

hashtag.org network · sponsored

Own #著作权法

This #name is available to claim. It becomes your portal on the open agent web: this very page, a keyword you rank for by an open public stake, and a verifiable identity for AI agents. Nobody else sells a page like this for every #name.

$2,449.80/ year · 4-character #name
Claim #著作权法$2,449.80/yrBuy on hashtag.space (web3)
card via hashtag.org · tokens via hashtag.space
0
Uses / 7 days
Mastodon
0
Accounts / 7 days
Mastodon
3
Recent posts
Mastodon
~0/hr
Recent pace
Mastodon · last 3
0
Avg reactions / post
Mastodon · last 3
Reddit posts / month
Reddit search
Open-web mentions
hashtag.org Firehose

Day-by-day usage

measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public tags API) · fetched 2026-08-25 02:29 UTC
0
08-19
0
08-20
0
08-21
0
08-22
0
08-23
0
08-24
0
08-25

0 uses by 0 unique accounts across the window. Real per-day counts, not estimates. Newest bar is today so far.

Related hashtags

measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public search API) · fetched 2026-08-25 02:29 UTC

No related tags with measured usage found for #著作权法.

Live pulse

measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon tag timeline) · fetched 2026-08-25 02:29 UTC

Everything below is measured over the latest 3 public posts (spanning ~980 hours).

Posting hours (UTC)

00:0012:0023:00

Languages: Chinese (3)

Avg boosts / post: 0

Top of the latest posts

  • 我觉得讨论 #同人作品 的版权争议时,是不是至少先读一下《#著作权法》及相关的司法解释 比如 剽窃和改编的根本区别是,前者会否认对原作品的依赖性、主张自己对相关元素的所有权(国家版权局版权管理司《关于如何认定抄袭行为给青岛市版权局的答复》(权司[1999]第6号):著作权法所称抄袭、剽窃,是同一概念;抄袭指将他人作品或者作品的片段窃为己有发表。);后者则(往往)强调与原作的依存、承袭关系(中华人民共和国文化部《图书、期刊版权保护试行条例实施细则》文出字(85)第37号:改编”

    杂食型蓑白(赛里斯地区的形态)@[email protected]002025-03-06 06:37 UTCView post →
  • ↑ 再有 #databaserights 只定义了数据库本身【可以】纳入版权法保护,并没有任何对数据库资料来源与数据库自身合法性关系的判定,因此数据库【可能】作为知识创造受版权法保护不代表未经许可的数据库编篡行为就一定违法,两者没有逻辑关系无法进行任何推导 而PRC的汇编作品保护也仅仅指出了「行使著作权时」作为限定条件,如果这次是RSS数据库指控博客原作者侵犯自己汇编著作权那自然可以套用,但对方并未做出如此指控吧? 最后 法律上的 #毒树之果 并不适用于 #著作权,典型的例子

    杂食型蓑白(赛里斯地区的形态)@[email protected]002025-01-24 11:20 UTCView post →
  • 呃…… 首先 #TRIPS 所定义的 #数据库权利 #databaserights https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRIPS_Agreement 的含义和作用是将对数据的整理以特例的形式纳入版权保护的范畴,「even if some or all of the contents do not themselves constitute materials protected by copyright」指的是数据库所编篡的数据而不是指获取数据的方式

    杂食型蓑白(赛里斯地区的形态)@[email protected]002025-01-24 11:03 UTCView post →

#著作权法 across platforms

every network with a public tag surface

Follow #著作权法 straight to each platform’s own tag page. Where a platform publishes open data we measure it above; the rest lock their numbers behind paid APIs, so we link rather than guess.

Every number above is measured from a named public API at the shown fetch time. Nothing is estimated or extrapolated. Platforms that lock their data behind paid APIs are not shown. Agents: the same numbers, as JSON, at /api/hashtags/著作权法