#顛覆罪
Live, measured metrics for the hashtag #顛覆罪 from the open social web. Every number carries a named source and the time it was fetched. Nothing is estimated.
Own #顛覆罪
This #name is available to claim. It becomes your portal on the open agent web: this very page, a keyword you rank for by an open public stake, and a verifiable identity for AI agents. Nobody else sells a page like this for every #name.
Day-by-day usage
measured · mas.to (Mastodon public tags API) · fetched 2026-08-21 12:54 UTC0 uses by 0 unique accounts across the window. Real per-day counts, not estimates. Newest bar is today so far.
Related hashtags
measured · mas.to (Mastodon public search API) · fetched 2026-08-21 12:54 UTCNo related tags with measured usage found for #顛覆罪.
Live pulse
measured · mas.to (Mastodon tag timeline) · fetched 2026-08-21 12:54 UTCEverything below is measured over the latest 2 public posts (spanning ~3312 hours).
Posting hours (UTC)
Languages: Chinese (2)
Avg boosts / post: 0.5
Top of the latest posts
47人案｜11被告獲批上訴至終審法院證明書 上訴庭指5議題具重大而廣泛重要性 47 人案 11 第一次上訴失敗的被告，周一（10 日）獲上訴庭批出上訴至終審法院證明書，各人得悉結果時神情輕鬆、交談。上訴庭在判詞指，涉案的 5 個議題具具重大而廣泛重要性，包括顛覆罪「其他非法手段」的正確詮釋、案中「謀劃」是否構成「非法手段」等。 11 名被告早前亦已直接向終院申請上訴許可，暫待排期聆訊。稍後有詳細報道。 11 人皆有到庭 獲派判詞 11 名申請證明書的被告分別為楊雪盈、黃碧雲、
支聯會案Day18．實時更新 辯方沈士文：指控基礎在鄒幸彤作供時擴大 支聯會被指煽顛案周三（25 日）踏入第 18 天審訊，庭上處理檢控基礎是否包括被告煽動他人在內地違法，而這是否屬於香港顛覆罪的「非法手段」。辯方大狀沈士文力陳，控方案情、證據沒指向這一點，而指控基礎在鄒幸彤作供時擴大，但完全不可能成立。 周二審訊中，李卓人一方就法官屢關注支聯會支持《零八憲章》等，涉否支援他人在內地違法等，提出該部分「唔應該成為本案嘅問題」，指因控方案情沒指被告以違內地刑法的手段達致中國修憲
#顛覆罪 across platforms
every network with a public tag surfaceFollow #顛覆罪 straight to each platform’s own tag page. Where a platform publishes open data we measure it above; the rest lock their numbers behind paid APIs, so we link rather than guess.
Every number above is measured from a named public API at the shown fetch time. Nothing is estimated or extrapolated. Platforms that lock their data behind paid APIs are not shown. Agents: the same numbers, as JSON, at /api/hashtags/顛覆罪