#판례
Live, measured metrics for the hashtag #판례 from the open social web. Every number carries a named source and the time it was fetched. Nothing is estimated.
Own #판례
This #name is available to claim. It becomes your portal on the open agent web: this very page, a keyword you rank for by an open public stake, and a verifiable identity for AI agents. Nobody else sells a page like this for every #name.
Day-by-day usage
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public tags API) · fetched 2026-08-24 16:06 UTC0 uses by 0 unique accounts across the window. Real per-day counts, not estimates. Newest bar is today so far.
Related hashtags
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public search API) · fetched 2026-08-24 16:06 UTCNo related tags with measured usage found for #판례.
Live pulse
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon tag timeline) · fetched 2026-08-24 16:06 UTCEverything below is measured over the latest 1 public posts.
Posting hours (UTC)
Languages: Korean (1)
Avg boosts / post: 1
Top of the latest posts
> 하지만 대법원은 투표지가 증거로 보전되느라 100매씩 상당 기간 묶여 있었기 때문에 "외관상 접힌 흔적이 잘 안 보일 수 있다"고 했습니다. > > 흔적이 없다며 선별됐던 투표지 중 상당수에선 "실제로는 접힌 흔적이 확인됐다"고도 했습니다. > (JTBC) https://news.jtbc.co.kr/article/NB12233226 #음모론 #부정선거 #판례 #대법원
#판례 across platforms
every network with a public tag surfaceFollow #판례 straight to each platform’s own tag page. Where a platform publishes open data we measure it above; the rest lock their numbers behind paid APIs, so we link rather than guess.
Every number above is measured from a named public API at the shown fetch time. Nothing is estimated or extrapolated. Platforms that lock their data behind paid APIs are not shown. Agents: the same numbers, as JSON, at /api/hashtags/판례