#apksigner
Live, measured metrics for the hashtag #apksigner from the open social web. Every number carries a named source and the time it was fetched. Nothing is estimated.
Own #apksigner
This #name is available to claim. It becomes your portal on the open agent web: this very page, a keyword you rank for by an open public stake, and a verifiable identity for AI agents. Nobody else sells a page like this for every #name.
Day-by-day usage
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public tags API) · fetched 2026-07-28 21:07 UTC0 uses by 0 unique accounts across the window. Real per-day counts, not estimates. Newest bar is today so far.
Related hashtags
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public search API) · fetched 2026-07-28 21:07 UTCNo related tags with measured usage found for #apksigner.
Live pulse
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon tag timeline) · fetched 2026-07-28 21:07 UTCEverything below is measured over the latest 6 public posts (spanning ~2818 hours).
Posting hours (UTC)
Languages: English (6)
Avg boosts / post: 0.3
Top of the latest posts
Game changer in my #mobile #coding was, when i figured out that i don't need #androidstudio to compile and sign #apk ! Just plain java development kit, android sdk and platform tools, #gradle and #apksigner Btw, i use #ionic with #vue to ma
#apksigner v35.0.2 is now in #Debian trixie. The v3.1 signer rotation stuff needs testing. Please try it out! Getting apksigner from Debian has two key advantages over the Google binaries: * They are reproducibly built. * They have an actua
So what is the Android team's intention? Should v3.1-only APKs be considered valid? Or not? My guess is they should be not considered valid since the Android team has explicitly marked that kind of signature as invalid since apksigner v30.0
Every number above is measured from a named public API at the shown fetch time. Nothing is estimated or extrapolated. Platforms that lock their data behind paid APIs are not shown. Agents: the same numbers, as JSON, at /api/hashtags/apksigner