#badcode
Live, measured metrics for the hashtag #badcode from the open social web. Every number carries a named source and the time it was fetched. Nothing is estimated.
Own #badcode
This #name is available to claim. It becomes your portal on the open agent web: this very page, a keyword you rank for by an open public stake, and a verifiable identity for AI agents. Nobody else sells a page like this for every #name.
Day-by-day usage
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public tags API) · fetched 2026-07-27 07:05 UTC0 uses by 0 unique accounts across the window. Real per-day counts, not estimates. Newest bar is today so far.
Related hashtags
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public search API) · fetched 2026-07-27 07:05 UTCLive pulse
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon tag timeline) · fetched 2026-07-27 07:05 UTCEverything below is measured over the latest 30 public posts (spanning ~58909 hours).
Posting hours (UTC) — busiest: 08:00
Languages: English (27) · French (1)
Avg boosts / post: 0.4
Top of the latest posts
Something about python makes it really easy for me to create incredibly annoying code. This was inside of 3 nested for loops (iterating n, k, and i). Situated on the single most breakable part of the entire algorithm. Yeahhh I'm gonna be re
[P] It just sets such a dangerous precedent ss I see people trusting AI AI highlights all the time—trusting entirely wrong, made-up information just because it's spoken with charismatic authority. I mean, I've even tried to challenge Gemini
From The Register: "#Cursor used agents to write a browser, proving #AI can write shoddy code at scale" #AIAgents #BadCode #Code #AISlop https://www.theregister.com/2026/01/22/cursor_ai_wrote_a_browser/
Every number above is measured from a named public API at the shown fetch time. Nothing is estimated or extrapolated. Platforms that lock their data behind paid APIs are not shown. Agents: the same numbers, as JSON, at /api/hashtags/badcode