#baseratefallacy

Live, measured metrics for the hashtag #baseratefallacy from the open social web. Every number carries a named source and the time it was fetched. Nothing is estimated.

hashtag.org network · sponsored

Own #baseratefallacy

This #name is available to claim. It becomes your portal on the open agent web: this very page, a keyword you rank for by an open public stake, and a verifiable identity for AI agents. Nobody else sells a page like this for every #name.

$5.00/ year · 15-character #name
Claim #baseratefallacy — $5.00/yr→
Annual, renews each year
Buy on hashtag.space (web3)
one-timepay once, yours for life
card via hashtag.org · tokens via hashtag.space
0
Uses / 7 days
Mastodon
0
Accounts / 7 days
Mastodon
7
Recent posts
Mastodon
~0/hr
Recent pace
Mastodon · last 7
0
Avg reactions / post
Mastodon · last 7

Day-by-day usage

measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public tags API) · fetched 2026-07-27 11:09 UTC
0
07-21
0
07-22
0
07-23
0
07-24
0
07-25
0
07-26
0
07-27

0 uses by 0 unique accounts across the window. Real per-day counts, not estimates. Newest bar is today so far.

Related hashtags

measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public search API) · fetched 2026-07-27 11:09 UTC

No related tags with measured usage found for #baseratefallacy.

Live pulse

measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon tag timeline) · fetched 2026-07-27 11:09 UTC

Everything below is measured over the latest 7 public posts (spanning ~37805 hours).

Posting hours (UTC)

00:0012:0023:00

Languages: English (6) · German (1)

Avg boosts / post: 0.3

Top of the latest posts

  • Ein neuer Zangerle ist in der Seuchenkolumne erschienen: Gute Nachrichten von Covid. Schlechte Nachrichten von der politischen Vernunft https://www.falter.at/seuchenkolumne/20240119/gute-nachrichten-von-covid-schlechte-nachrichten-von-der-p

    dasgrueneblatt@[email protected]♥ 0↻ 02024-01-19 13:05 UTCView post →

  • "When Cognitive Reflection Leads to Less Overall but More Systematic Judgment Bias": 🤨 Participants who performed better on trick math and logic questions (a.k.a., reflection tests) were MORE (not less) likely to commit a statistical error

    Nick Byrd, Ph.D.@[email protected]♥ 0↻ 02023-06-08 14:23 UTCView post →

  • @jbaert Ik hoop dat ze dat niet doen: 26% True Positive, 9% False Positive ... Als 10% van de klas ChatGPT gebruikt, dan gaat 75% van de ‘dit is een AI’ voorspellingen een valse beschuldiging zijn. #BaseRateFallacy

    Remko Tronçon@[email protected]♥ 0↻ 02023-02-01 21:47 UTCView post →

Every number above is measured from a named public API at the shown fetch time. Nothing is estimated or extrapolated. Platforms that lock their data behind paid APIs are not shown. Agents: the same numbers, as JSON, at /api/hashtags/baseratefallacy