#bibliographiction
Live, measured metrics for the hashtag #bibliographiction from the open social web. Every number carries a named source and the time it was fetched. Nothing is estimated.
Own #bibliographiction
This #name is available to claim. It becomes your portal on the open agent web: this very page, a keyword you rank for by an open public stake, and a verifiable identity for AI agents. Nobody else sells a page like this for every #name.
Day-by-day usage
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public tags API) · fetched 2026-07-30 06:11 UTC0 uses by 0 unique accounts across the window. Real per-day counts, not estimates. Newest bar is today so far.
Related hashtags
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public search API) · fetched 2026-07-30 06:11 UTCNo related tags with measured usage found for #bibliographiction.
Live pulse
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon tag timeline) · fetched 2026-07-30 06:11 UTCEverything below is measured over the latest 3 public posts (spanning ~408 hours).
Posting hours (UTC)
Languages: English (3)
Avg boosts / post: 0.3
Used together with
No co-used tags in the sample.
Top of the latest posts
An author's own #bibliographiction: Himes remembering a rejection as a publication (from https://egrove.olemiss.edu/studies_eng_new/vol8/iss1/7)
Or another #bibliographiction: the idea that Gordimer's _July's People_ was banned in South Africa (here in a 2019 retrospective feature from the Index on Censorship). According to Peter McDonald's _The Literature Police_, it never was. Thi
I would like to introduce the concept of #bibliographiction: Bibliographical assertions which are difficult to check, make eminent sense, and prove to be wrong or unverifiable. Example: Gurnah, "1993, Stockholm," on GV Desani. I have examin
Every number above is measured from a named public API at the shown fetch time. Nothing is estimated or extrapolated. Platforms that lock their data behind paid APIs are not shown. Agents: the same numbers, as JSON, at /api/hashtags/bibliographiction