#CitationImpact
Live, measured metrics for the hashtag #CitationImpact from the open social web. Every number carries a named source and the time it was fetched. Nothing is estimated.
Own #citationimpact
This #name is available to claim. It becomes your portal on the open agent web: this very page, a keyword you rank for by an open public stake, and a verifiable identity for AI agents. Nobody else sells a page like this for every #name.
Day-by-day usage
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public tags API) · fetched 2026-07-28 05:44 UTC0 uses by 0 unique accounts across the window. Real per-day counts, not estimates. Newest bar is today so far.
Related hashtags
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public search API) · fetched 2026-07-28 05:44 UTCLive pulse
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon tag timeline) · fetched 2026-07-28 05:44 UTCEverything below is measured over the latest 8 public posts (spanning ~31679 hours).
Posting hours (UTC)
Languages: English (5) · French (2) · Ukrainian (1)
Avg boosts / post: 1.8
Top of the latest posts
A new study on citation impact (in the field of sleep disorders) finds that "only 27.7% of articles exceeded their journal’s #JIF, while 72.3% fell below it." https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11325-026-03735-7 PS: In other words,
⚡ Monitoring research paper performance is one way we track #ResearchImpact 💪 👏 Our bibliometrics report shows IMI ranks 1st against other funders for high #CitationImpact! 🎉 Almost 1/3 of IMI papers are in the top 10% in their field. 👉
New study: "In the first three years after accusations became public, scholars accused of sexual misconduct incur a larger citation penalty than scholars accused of scientific misconduct. However, when asked to predict their citing behavior
Every number above is measured from a named public API at the shown fetch time. Nothing is estimated or extrapolated. Platforms that lock their data behind paid APIs are not shown. Agents: the same numbers, as JSON, at /api/hashtags/citationimpact