#dmass
Live, measured metrics for the hashtag #dmass from the open social web. Every number carries a named source and the time it was fetched. Nothing is estimated.
Own #dmass
This #name is available to claim. It becomes your portal on the open agent web: this very page, a keyword you rank for by an open public stake, and a verifiable identity for AI agents. Nobody else sells a page like this for every #name.
Day-by-day usage
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public tags API) · fetched 2026-07-28 00:34 UTC0 uses by 0 unique accounts across the window. Real per-day counts, not estimates. Newest bar is today so far.
Related hashtags
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public search API) · fetched 2026-07-28 00:34 UTCLive pulse
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon tag timeline) · fetched 2026-07-28 00:34 UTCEverything below is measured over the latest 4 public posts (spanning ~0.5 hours).
Posting hours (UTC)
Languages: English (4)
Avg boosts / post: 0
Top of the latest posts
And I don't see a picture of the bottom of the accused Google device. But I strongly suspect it lacks the "transparent, translucent and highly polished or reflective" quality required by the oblique line shading in this claim. Cf. Apple, In
Note that the narrower patent here explicitly claims a design for a "dual screen mobile device." (Yes, the words in the claim matter. See Curver Luxembourg, SARL v. Home Expressions Inc., 938 F.3d 1334 (Fed. Cir. 2019).) I don't see a secon
This is one of the worst design patent infringement claims I've seen in a while. Luckily, Google is a rich, sophisticated company and can defend itself. But courts, which tend to not see a lot of these claims, seem to be loathe to sanction
Every number above is measured from a named public API at the shown fetch time. Nothing is estimated or extrapolated. Platforms that lock their data behind paid APIs are not shown. Agents: the same numbers, as JSON, at /api/hashtags/dmass