#dotcombubble

Live, measured metrics for the hashtag #dotcombubble from the open social web. Every number carries a named source and the time it was fetched. Nothing is estimated.

hashtag.org network · sponsored

Own #dotcombubble

This #name is available to claim. It becomes your portal on the open agent web: this very page, a keyword you rank for by an open public stake, and a verifiable identity for AI agents. Nobody else sells a page like this for every #name.

$5.00/ year · 12-character #name
Claim #dotcombubble$5.00/yrBuy on hashtag.space (web3)
card via hashtag.org · tokens via hashtag.space
2
Uses / 7 days
Mastodon
2
Accounts / 7 days
Mastodon
40
Recent posts
Mastodon
~0/hr
Recent pace
Mastodon · last 40
0.3
Avg reactions / post
Mastodon · last 40

Day-by-day usage

measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public tags API) · fetched 2026-07-27 21:57 UTC
1
07-21
0
07-22
0
07-23
0
07-24
0
07-25
0
07-26
1
07-27

2 uses by 2 unique accounts across the window. Real per-day counts, not estimates. Newest bar is today so far.

Related hashtags

measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public search API) · fetched 2026-07-27 21:57 UTC

Live pulse

measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon tag timeline) · fetched 2026-07-27 21:57 UTC

Everything below is measured over the latest 40 public posts (spanning ~30056 hours).

Posting hours (UTC) — busiest: 22:00

00:0012:0023:00

Languages: English (35) · German (3) · Chinese (1) · French (1)

Avg boosts / post: 1.7

Top of the latest posts

  • "Now, I know what you’re thinking. Ed, isn’t that exactly what’s happening here? We’ve got overvalued startups, we’ve got multiple unprofitable, unsustainable AI companies promising to IPO, we’ve got overvalued tech stocks, and we’ve got on

    Miguel Afonso Caetano@[email protected]762026-01-17 13:40 UTCView post →
  • This week on Cybercultural, we enter the year 2000. It started with a bang, with the AOL-Time Warner merger in January. But by March, a slow deflation of the dot-com bubble had begun (Fast Company magazine had an ill-timed cover that month:

    Richard MacManus@[email protected]302025-09-09 13:41 UTCView post →
  • 看到Dot-Com-bubble Wiki里的一段: 在这种氛围下,许多投资者愿意忽视市盈率等传统指标,而将信心建立在技术进步之上,最终导致了股市泡沫 。995 年至 2000 年间,纳斯达克综合指数上涨了 400%。其市盈率一度高达 200 倍,远超 1991 年日本资产价格泡沫时期日经 225 指数 80 倍的峰值市盈率。1999 年, 高通股价飙升 2619%,另有 12 只大型股股价涨幅均超过 1000%,还有 7 只大型股股价涨幅均超过 900%。尽管纳斯达克综合指

    KIP/JΛYCHØU ⁂ :chuckya: :atproto: :nostr:@[email protected]102026-03-16 19:25 UTCView post →

Every number above is measured from a named public API at the shown fetch time. Nothing is estimated or extrapolated. Platforms that lock their data behind paid APIs are not shown. Agents: the same numbers, as JSON, at /api/hashtags/dotcombubble