#fakecitations

Live, measured metrics for the hashtag #fakecitations from the open social web. Every number carries a named source and the time it was fetched. Nothing is estimated.

hashtag.org network · sponsored

Own #fakecitations

This #name is available to claim. It becomes your portal on the open agent web: this very page, a keyword you rank for by an open public stake, and a verifiable identity for AI agents. Nobody else sells a page like this for every #name.

$5.00/ year · 13-character #name
Claim #fakecitations$5.00/yrBuy on hashtag.space (web3)
card via hashtag.org · tokens via hashtag.space
0
Uses / 7 days
Mastodon
0
Accounts / 7 days
Mastodon
7
Recent posts
Mastodon
~0/hr
Recent pace
Mastodon · last 7
0.3
Avg reactions / post
Mastodon · last 7

Day-by-day usage

measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public tags API) · fetched 2026-07-30 04:53 UTC
0
07-24
0
07-25
0
07-26
0
07-27
0
07-28
0
07-29
0
07-30

0 uses by 0 unique accounts across the window. Real per-day counts, not estimates. Newest bar is today so far.

Related hashtags

measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public search API) · fetched 2026-07-30 04:53 UTC

Live pulse

measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon tag timeline) · fetched 2026-07-30 04:53 UTC

Everything below is measured over the latest 7 public posts (spanning ~16469 hours).

Top of the latest posts

  • More evidence catching #publishers at gaming their journal impact factor (#JIF). https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.03771 "Sneaked references are references registered in the metadata of publications without being listed in reference section or in

    petersuber@[email protected]2312025-01-08 15:36 UTCView post →
  • Techdirt: DOJ Now Citing Fake AI-Generated Cases To Keep ICE Detainees Locked Up. “You’d think that watching multiple lawyers get caught red-handed using AI to file briefs full of made-up citations would cause everyone in the legal professi

    ResearchBuzz: Firehose@[email protected]022026-07-23 12:37 UTCView post →
  • CIDRAP: Review uncovers rising rate of fake references in published biomedical papers. “A systematic review published yesterday in The Lancet reveals that of 97.1 million verified references in published biomedical papers, 4,046 were likely

    ResearchBuzz: Firehose@[email protected]012026-05-12 16:20 UTCView post →

Every number above is measured from a named public API at the shown fetch time. Nothing is estimated or extrapolated. Platforms that lock their data behind paid APIs are not shown. Agents: the same numbers, as JSON, at /api/hashtags/fakecitations