#geniusact2025
Live, measured metrics for the hashtag #geniusact2025 from the open social web. Every number carries a named source and the time it was fetched. Nothing is estimated.
Own #geniusact2025
This #name is available to claim. It becomes your portal on the open agent web: this very page, a keyword you rank for by an open public stake, and a verifiable identity for AI agents. Nobody else sells a page like this for every #name.
Day-by-day usage
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public tags API) · fetched 2026-07-29 17:46 UTC0 uses by 0 unique accounts across the window. Real per-day counts, not estimates. Newest bar is today so far.
Related hashtags
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public search API) · fetched 2026-07-29 17:46 UTCNo related tags with measured usage found for #geniusact2025.
Live pulse
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon tag timeline) · fetched 2026-07-29 17:46 UTCEverything below is measured over the latest 6 public posts (spanning ~1409 hours).
Posting hours (UTC)
Languages: English (6)
Avg boosts / post: 0
Top of the latest posts
Look, I'm not going to deny that the GENIUS Act has major flaws, but I really, really hope that there are regulations on stablecoins, rather than say "haha, blockchains are a scam, therefore we shouldn't regulate that stuff." Are you hearin
With the GENIUS Act of 2025 possibly getting the greenlight, I could imagine the inception of some "capital reserve agreement" being signed that allows people—who otherwise would lack the capital reserve—to start their own stablecoin. (This
What actually sucks about the GENIUS Act: stablecoin holders get first dibs if the stablecoin issuer defaults. Who can be issuers? Federally insured banks and subsidiaries. If these banks commingle deposits with reserves, then this will for
Every number above is measured from a named public API at the shown fetch time. Nothing is estimated or extrapolated. Platforms that lock their data behind paid APIs are not shown. Agents: the same numbers, as JSON, at /api/hashtags/geniusact2025