#glitzerverbot
Live, measured metrics for the hashtag #glitzerverbot from the open social web. Every number carries a named source and the time it was fetched. Nothing is estimated.
Own #glitzerverbot
This #name is available to claim. It becomes your portal on the open agent web: this very page, a keyword you rank for by an open public stake, and a verifiable identity for AI agents. Nobody else sells a page like this for every #name.
Day-by-day usage
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public tags API) · fetched 2026-07-28 19:15 UTC0 uses by 0 unique accounts across the window. Real per-day counts, not estimates. Newest bar is today so far.
Related hashtags
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public search API) · fetched 2026-07-28 19:15 UTCNo related tags with measured usage found for #glitzerverbot.
Live pulse
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon tag timeline) · fetched 2026-07-28 19:15 UTCEverything below is measured over the latest 3 public posts (spanning ~164 hours).
Posting hours (UTC)
Languages: German (3)
Avg boosts / post: 0.7
Top of the latest posts
"Meines Erachtens ist der Treiber für das Verbot das Vorsorgeprinzip, das in der EU angewendet wird. [...] Ein zweiter Treiber ist, dass Mikroplastik in vielen Produkten einfach überflüssig ist, weil es ökologisch verträgliche Alternativen
"Worauf man sofort verzichten kann, wie loses Glitzer", das sagt sie so einfach, meine Kollegin Andrea. In einschlägigen Social-Bubbles sorgte aber das vermeintliche #Glitzerverbot der EU für Wirbel. Daher spreche ich in der neuesten Podcas
„Ohne Glitzer bin ich verloren“: In sozialen Medien kursieren viele Fake-News rund um das beschlossene Mikroplastikverbot in der EU. Tiktokerïnnen hamstern panisch Kosmetik und sprechen von einem Glitzerverbot. Aber was ist da dran? (€) Ele
Every number above is measured from a named public API at the shown fetch time. Nothing is estimated or extrapolated. Platforms that lock their data behind paid APIs are not shown. Agents: the same numbers, as JSON, at /api/hashtags/glitzerverbot