#little_h
Live, measured metrics for the hashtag #little_h from the open social web. Every number carries a named source and the time it was fetched. Nothing is estimated.
Own #little_h
This #name is available to claim. It becomes your portal on the open agent web: this very page, a keyword you rank for by an open public stake, and a verifiable identity for AI agents. Nobody else sells a page like this for every #name.
Day-by-day usage
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public tags API) · fetched 2026-07-30 04:39 UTC0 uses by 0 unique accounts across the window. Real per-day counts, not estimates. Newest bar is today so far.
Related hashtags
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public search API) · fetched 2026-07-30 04:39 UTCNo related tags with measured usage found for #little_h.
Live pulse
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon tag timeline) · fetched 2026-07-30 04:39 UTCEverything below is measured over the latest 2 public posts (spanning ~67 hours).
Posting hours (UTC)
Languages: English (2)
Avg boosts / post: 1
Top of the latest posts
@pomarede @TillSawala @cosmology It's good that 'Science' magazine caught up and that Sylos Labini has acknowledged the error :). However, the 'Science' text omits the fact that the #little_h error (a factor of about 1.4) counts for a lot m
@cosmology @pomarede @redshiftdrift In their article that is *still* not on #ArXiv, looks like #SylosLabini+#Galoppo made two elementary mistakes. @TillSawala has reanalysed the data, and presented a convincing case that SylosLabini+Galoppo
Every number above is measured from a named public API at the shown fetch time. Nothing is estimated or extrapolated. Platforms that lock their data behind paid APIs are not shown. Agents: the same numbers, as JSON, at /api/hashtags/little_h