#researchethics
Live, measured metrics for the hashtag #researchethics from the open social web. Every number carries a named source and the time it was fetched. Nothing is estimated.
Own #researchethics
This #name is available to claim. It becomes your portal on the open agent web: this very page, a keyword you rank for by an open public stake, and a verifiable identity for AI agents. Nobody else sells a page like this for every #name.
Day-by-day usage
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public tags API) · fetched 2026-07-30 23:23 UTC0 uses by 0 unique accounts across the window. Real per-day counts, not estimates. Newest bar is today so far.
Related hashtags
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public search API) · fetched 2026-07-30 23:23 UTCLive pulse
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon tag timeline) · fetched 2026-07-30 23:23 UTCEverything below is measured over the latest 40 public posts (spanning ~6887 hours).
Posting hours (UTC) — busiest: 10:00
Languages: English (36) · German (3)
Avg boosts / post: 1.9
Top of the latest posts
Wow... I was just pointed to this paper https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2024.104081 and its retraction https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2024.104550 Want to read the first sentence of the introduction together with me? "Certainly, here is a
This paper presents a principled argument within the U.S.’ misconduct regulations that hallucinated citations may be a form of data fabrication and therefore count as research misconduct. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0898962
A new study warns that automated writing tools may amplify plagiarism in scientific papers. As AI speeds up publishing, concerns grow about integrity and originality in research outputs. 🔗 https://phys.org/news/2026-04-plagiarized-automate
Every number above is measured from a named public API at the shown fetch time. Nothing is estimated or extrapolated. Platforms that lock their data behind paid APIs are not shown. Agents: the same numbers, as JSON, at /api/hashtags/researchethics