#retractions
Live, measured metrics for the hashtag #retractions from the open social web. Every number carries a named source and the time it was fetched. Nothing is estimated.
Own #retractions
This #name is available to claim. It becomes your portal on the open agent web: this very page, a keyword you rank for by an open public stake, and a verifiable identity for AI agents. Nobody else sells a page like this for every #name.
Day-by-day usage
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public tags API) · fetched 2026-07-27 09:42 UTC0 uses by 0 unique accounts across the window. Real per-day counts, not estimates. Newest bar is today so far.
Related hashtags
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public search API) · fetched 2026-07-27 09:42 UTCLive pulse
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon tag timeline) · fetched 2026-07-27 09:42 UTCEverything below is measured over the latest 40 public posts (spanning ~9003 hours).
Posting hours (UTC) — busiest: 17:00
Languages: English (37) · German (2) · French (1)
Avg boosts / post: 6.9
Top of the latest posts
#Elsevier finally (after 25 years) retracted the primary study concluding that #glyphosate is safe for humans. Glyphosate is the active ingredient in the #Roundup herbicide, manufactured by #Monsanto. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a
A new study finds that by 2023, APC-based #OpenAccess articles had surpassed paywalled subscription articles in #retractions. https://insights.uksg.org/articles/10.1629/uksg.763 The study does not blame OA as such. It blames the APC busines
New study: "In over 80% of cases the [tested] #LLMs claimed that a retracted article had not been retracted…LLMs have little ability to distinguish between valid and retracted studies, unless they are allowed to, and do, check online." http
Every number above is measured from a named public API at the shown fetch time. Nothing is estimated or extrapolated. Platforms that lock their data behind paid APIs are not shown. Agents: the same numbers, as JSON, at /api/hashtags/retractions