#retractionwatch
Live, measured metrics for the hashtag #retractionwatch from the open social web. Every number carries a named source and the time it was fetched. Nothing is estimated.
Own #retractionwatch
This #name is available to claim. It becomes your portal on the open agent web: this very page, a keyword you rank for by an open public stake, and a verifiable identity for AI agents. Nobody else sells a page like this for every #name.
Day-by-day usage
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public tags API) · fetched 2026-07-27 07:42 UTC0 uses by 0 unique accounts across the window. Real per-day counts, not estimates. Newest bar is today so far.
Related hashtags
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public search API) · fetched 2026-07-27 07:42 UTCLive pulse
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon tag timeline) · fetched 2026-07-27 07:42 UTCEverything below is measured over the latest 40 public posts (spanning ~13456 hours).
Posting hours (UTC) — busiest: 12:00
Languages: English (35) · German (3) · Icelandic (1) · Ukrainian (1)
Avg boosts / post: 1.5
Top of the latest posts
You know all of those recent results showing glyphosate / RoundUp are dangerous? And how some apologists retort "yeah well we have decades of data not showing harm"? Turns out that old data that purportedly demonstrates safety was falsified
"As a nonsense phrase of shady provenance makes the rounds, Elsevier defends its use" https://retractionwatch.com/2025/02/10/vegetative-electron-microscopy-fingerprint-paper-mill/ #RetractionWatch #Elsvier #AcademicChatter
@elaterite @ticho As it happens #RetractionWatch is featuring the following article in their weekend roundup: https://utppublishing.com/doi/10.3138/jsp-2025-0047 (Discussion of academic publishing.)
Every number above is measured from a named public API at the shown fetch time. Nothing is estimated or extrapolated. Platforms that lock their data behind paid APIs are not shown. Agents: the same numbers, as JSON, at /api/hashtags/retractionwatch