#ScientificIntegrity

Live, measured metrics for the hashtag #ScientificIntegrity from the open social web. Every number carries a named source and the time it was fetched. Nothing is estimated.

hashtag.org network · sponsored

Own #scientificintegrity

This #name is available to claim. It becomes your portal on the open agent web: this very page, a keyword you rank for by an open public stake, and a verifiable identity for AI agents. Nobody else sells a page like this for every #name.

$5.00/ year · 19-character #name
Claim #scientificintegrity$5.00/yr
Annual, renews each year
Buy on hashtag.space (web3)
one-timepay once, yours for life
card via hashtag.org · tokens via hashtag.space
0
Uses / 7 days
Mastodon
0
Accounts / 7 days
Mastodon
40
Recent posts
Mastodon
~0/hr
Recent pace
Mastodon · last 40
1
Avg reactions / post
Mastodon · last 40

Day-by-day usage

measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public tags API) · fetched 2026-07-27 08:13 UTC
0
07-21
0
07-22
0
07-23
0
07-24
0
07-25
0
07-26
0
07-27

0 uses by 0 unique accounts across the window. Real per-day counts, not estimates. Newest bar is today so far.

Related hashtags

measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public search API) · fetched 2026-07-27 08:13 UTC

No related tags with measured usage found for #scientificintegrity.

Live pulse

measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon tag timeline) · fetched 2026-07-27 08:13 UTC

Everything below is measured over the latest 40 public posts (spanning ~11460 hours).

Posting hours (UTC) — busiest: 15:00

00:0012:0023:00

Languages: English (36) · German (2) · French (2)

Avg boosts / post: 1.6

Top of the latest posts

  • Joining a new instance, posting a new #introduction. After three years in the Fediverse, including two wonderful years at https://fediscience.org/@fresseng, I’m joining the first French instance that is both dedicated to and hosted by the a

    Nicolas Fressengeas@[email protected]35222025-11-28 14:53 UTCView post →
  • A new study warns that automated writing tools may amplify plagiarism in scientific papers. As AI speeds up publishing, concerns grow about integrity and originality in research outputs. 🔗 https://phys.org/news/2026-04-plagiarized-automate

    LeidenForce@[email protected]222026-05-20 08:49 UTCView post →
  • Among other corrupting interference, the fossil fuel industry would like peer review including "peers" asserting the radiative physics equivalent of 2+2=5. "The issue is one of attribution: Can we detect the cause of climate change in indiv

    Doug Bostrom@[email protected]112026-06-13 15:14 UTCView post →

Every number above is measured from a named public API at the shown fetch time. Nothing is estimated or extrapolated. Platforms that lock their data behind paid APIs are not shown. Agents: the same numbers, as JSON, at /api/hashtags/scientificintegrity