#scientificmisconduct
Live, measured metrics for the hashtag #scientificmisconduct from the open social web. Every number carries a named source and the time it was fetched. Nothing is estimated.
Own #scientificmisconduct
This #name is available to claim. It becomes your portal on the open agent web: this very page, a keyword you rank for by an open public stake, and a verifiable identity for AI agents. Nobody else sells a page like this for every #name.
Day-by-day usage
measured · mastodon.social (Mastodon public tags API) · fetched 2026-09-29 21:37 UTC0 uses by 0 unique accounts across the window. Real per-day counts, not estimates. Newest bar is today so far.
Related hashtags
measured · mastodon.social (Mastodon public search API) · fetched 2026-09-29 21:37 UTCNo related tags with measured usage found for #scientificmisconduct.
Live pulse
measured · mastodon.social (Mastodon tag timeline) · fetched 2026-09-29 21:37 UTCEverything below is measured over the latest 33 public posts (spanning ~33261 hours).
Posting hours (UTC) — busiest: 06:00
Languages: English (28) · German (4) · French (1)
Avg boosts / post: 3.5
Top of the latest posts
"For more than a century, scientific journals have been the pipes through which knowledge of the natural world flows into our culture. Now they’re being clogged with AI slop." - Ross Andersen at The Atlantic https://www.theatlantic.com/scie
This strikes me as an unusually aggressive approach for a journal to take in response to #ScientificMisconduct. It's basically like like those photos of the people who passed bad checks on the wall behind the cashier at your local 7-11. It
UBC ... does not come out of this story smelling like roses. "A celebrated Vancouver researcher used fabricated data and hid evidence of infected wounds to falsely claim his patented skin treatment could heal years-old bed sores in a matter
#scientificmisconduct across platforms
every network with a public tag surfaceFollow #scientificmisconduct straight to each platform’s own tag page. Where a platform publishes open data we measure it above; the rest lock their numbers behind paid APIs, so we link rather than guess.
Every number above is measured from a named public API at the shown fetch time. Nothing is estimated or extrapolated. Platforms that lock their data behind paid APIs are not shown. Agents: the same numbers, as JSON, at /api/hashtags/scientificmisconduct