#swifttesting
Live, measured metrics for the hashtag #swifttesting from the open social web. Every number carries a named source and the time it was fetched. Nothing is estimated.
Own #swifttesting
This #name is available to claim. It becomes your portal on the open agent web: this very page, a keyword you rank for by an open public stake, and a verifiable identity for AI agents. Nobody else sells a page like this for every #name.
Day-by-day usage
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public tags API) · fetched 2026-07-27 22:01 UTC0 uses by 0 unique accounts across the window. Real per-day counts, not estimates. Newest bar is today so far.
Related hashtags
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public search API) · fetched 2026-07-27 22:01 UTCNo related tags with measured usage found for #swifttesting.
Live pulse
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon tag timeline) · fetched 2026-07-27 22:01 UTCEverything below is measured over the latest 38 public posts (spanning ~18068 hours).
Posting hours (UTC) — busiest: 19:00
Languages: English (38)
Avg boosts / post: 1.4
Top of the latest posts
Why do we still need custom assertions when #𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑡 is already more informative than XCTest? The key: use 𝑆𝑜𝑢𝑟𝑐𝑒𝐿𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 to report failures at the call site, not inside helpers. For complex validation, 𝐼𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑒.𝑟𝑒𝑐�
#buildInPublic #iosDev #coreData #swiftTesting Since I’m eventually going to have to take a populated database and convert it from the old model to the new model, I’m going to tag the current repo so I can come back to it and build my test
My solution uses a combination of macOS accessibility APIs and CGEvents directly (not keyDown), the former of which understands the whereabouts of the simulator, the latter for how to find the center of the viewport, set up a two-finger ges
Every number above is measured from a named public API at the shown fetch time. Nothing is estimated or extrapolated. Platforms that lock their data behind paid APIs are not shown. Agents: the same numbers, as JSON, at /api/hashtags/swifttesting