#ThinkingAboutCapitalism
Live, measured metrics for the hashtag #ThinkingAboutCapitalism from the open social web. Every number carries a named source and the time it was fetched. Nothing is estimated.
Own #thinkingaboutcapitalism
This #name is available to claim. It becomes your portal on the open agent web: this very page, a keyword you rank for by an open public stake, and a verifiable identity for AI agents. Nobody else sells a page like this for every #name.
Day-by-day usage
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public tags API) · fetched 2026-07-28 21:06 UTC0 uses by 0 unique accounts across the window. Real per-day counts, not estimates. Newest bar is today so far.
Related hashtags
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public search API) · fetched 2026-07-28 21:06 UTCNo related tags with measured usage found for #thinkingaboutcapitalism.
Live pulse
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon tag timeline) · fetched 2026-07-28 21:06 UTCEverything below is measured over the latest 2 public posts (spanning ~140 hours).
Posting hours (UTC)
Languages: Chinese (2)
Avg boosts / post: 0.5
Used together with
Top of the latest posts
福利国家的三种模式下，生育率的差别： 自由模式-美国：生育率最高的居然是美国（不，应该说美国居然也算福利国家）。总之，公司开人雇人都很容易。税也比较低。女性可以在生育期间gap，再重回职场。或者男的带娃。反正就是怎么都可以啦。生育率是2.1。 北欧模式：社会福利相当好，孩子的医疗、教育基本政府包了。生育率1.8。 天主教模式-日本、德国、南欧：基本理念是男性挣钱养全家，女性在家带娃。公司很难开除男性。而女性则必须在成为职业女性和成为母亲之间做选择（这不就是说的宝冢么）。生育率
马克思作为一个社科研究者，是不合格的。他结论先行、进而resource mining，就是在所有资料里面仅截取对结论有利的部分、而无视那些与结论不符的部分。难怪乎他对于资本主义的观察与分析错得离谱。他的观点在共产主义宣言中基本就成型了，而资本论只是从英国政府报告（蓝皮书）中搜罗了一些符合其观点的事实、数据来进行论述。 然而他的观点/结论却颇能迎合一些受到宗教、阶级压迫的族群，以及一些喜欢简单理论的群体。因为他描画了一个没有压迫的乌托邦；其理论也比较简单。 并不是说他一无是处，
Every number above is measured from a named public API at the shown fetch time. Nothing is estimated or extrapolated. Platforms that lock their data behind paid APIs are not shown. Agents: the same numbers, as JSON, at /api/hashtags/thinkingaboutcapitalism