#time_t
Live, measured metrics for the hashtag #time_t from the open social web. Every number carries a named source and the time it was fetched. Nothing is estimated.
Own #time_t
This #name is available to claim. It becomes your portal on the open agent web: this very page, a keyword you rank for by an open public stake, and a verifiable identity for AI agents. Nobody else sells a page like this for every #name.
Day-by-day usage
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public tags API) · fetched 2026-07-27 09:01 UTC0 uses by 0 unique accounts across the window. Real per-day counts, not estimates. Newest bar is today so far.
Related hashtags
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public search API) · fetched 2026-07-27 09:01 UTCLive pulse
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon tag timeline) · fetched 2026-07-27 09:01 UTCEverything below is measured over the latest 28 public posts (spanning ~15571 hours).
Posting hours (UTC) — busiest: 13:00
Languages: English (16) · Polish (8) · Chinese (2) · German (1) · Russian (1)
Avg boosts / post: 4
Top of the latest posts
whoa! I run a mix of debian testing/unstable on my main home machine and the "t64" packages have started showing up in unstable. I was like... "what's t64". And it's time. time is changing. https://lwn.net/Articles/938149/ #debian #time_t #
👉 Neuer Blog: „time_t Cast Away: Bits über Bord und der Y2K38 Bug ist zurück“ Die Umstellung auf 64-Bit-time_t gilt als Lösung für das Year 2038 Problem. Doch Direct Casts machen den Fix schnell unwirksam – und schicken uns zurück ins Jahr
Yesterday, while testing time64, I was wondering if we could switch #Python to 64-bit #time_t immediately and unconditionally, and get rid of some #y2k38 problems we're facing today already (these affecting Python packages). Unfortunately,
Every number above is measured from a named public API at the shown fetch time. Nothing is estimated or extrapolated. Platforms that lock their data behind paid APIs are not shown. Agents: the same numbers, as JSON, at /api/hashtags/time_t