#wecheck
Live, measured metrics for the hashtag #wecheck from the open social web. Every number carries a named source and the time it was fetched. Nothing is estimated.
Own #wecheck
This #name is available to claim. It becomes your portal on the open agent web: this very page, a keyword you rank for by an open public stake, and a verifiable identity for AI agents. Nobody else sells a page like this for every #name.
Day-by-day usage
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public tags API) · fetched 2026-08-24 05:40 UTC0 uses by 0 unique accounts across the window. Real per-day counts, not estimates. Newest bar is today so far.
Related hashtags
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon public search API) · fetched 2026-08-24 05:40 UTCLive pulse
measured · fosstodon.org (Mastodon tag timeline) · fetched 2026-08-24 05:40 UTCEverything below is measured over the latest 2 public posts (spanning ~0.2 hours).
Posting hours (UTC)
Languages: English (2)
Avg boosts / post: 5.5
Top of the latest posts
还有之前一张流传很广的聊天记录截图 自称做过审查工作的人解释现在#微信 审查的概况 「我介绍一下吧，以前做过这方面的工作，不是微信或腾讯员工。不一定准确但大同小异 首先，最土的是人工审核，纯人看。这个已淘汰不讲了 第二代是语义识别＋人工审核。就是发现关键字触发进审，人工审核干死。 但是这个有个问题就是语义识别没问题，但是对抗语义识别的方式有不少。比如发图片，图片里还打杠杠啥的。或者用拼音，谐音来代替。各种方法群友也用了不少了 于是演化出第三代，语义识别（音视频识别）＋策略＋人
补充一个可能有人不知道的信息，这也是为什么很推荐privatebin的一大原因 详见这条嘟嘟：https://g0v.social/@MotiFount/108663608241818370 总结：只要在微信发外链，无论以什么形式，腾讯官方都会自动主动访问一遍链接网站 目前尚不清楚：它们访问的目的是什么？访问后会如何？会不会抓取网页界面存档？网页里的敏感关键词会不会和聊天里的一样被判断风险？ 但是，只要在微信发链接，网站一定会被微信访问 所以提倡： 1、发链接的时候顺手加上空
#wecheck across platforms
every network with a public tag surfaceFollow #wecheck straight to each platform’s own tag page. Where a platform publishes open data we measure it above; the rest lock their numbers behind paid APIs, so we link rather than guess.
Every number above is measured from a named public API at the shown fetch time. Nothing is estimated or extrapolated. Platforms that lock their data behind paid APIs are not shown. Agents: the same numbers, as JSON, at /api/hashtags/wecheck