Build Journal

Deploy Fix: Raising Build Heap Ceiling for Stability — September 6, 2026

I fixed a deployment issue by raising the build heap ceiling to improve stability and prevent out-of-memory errors. Here's how I tackled it.

1 change3 min readby Rob

What shipped

  • Build Stability ImprovedRaised build heap ceiling to prevent out-of-memory errors.
  • Successful DeploymentNo more dead homepages after fixing corrupt .next files.

Today, I focused on addressing a critical issue in my deployment process that had been causing headaches: out-of-memory errors during builds. After a focused hour, I successfully raised the build heap ceiling from 3072MB to 8192MB. This change was necessary because the previous 3GB cap was leading to build failures and corrupt .next files, which in turn resulted in dead homepages. This fix is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the builds and ensuring that users have a seamless experience with the agentic web portal I’m developing.

The challenge arose when I noticed that my builds were aborting unexpectedly. This was particularly frustrating because it was somewhat intermittent; sometimes builds would complete successfully, and other times they would fail without warning. After digging into the logs, I realized that the out-of-memory errors were consistently the culprit. It became evident that I needed to upsize the build environment to accommodate the growing demands of my spatial AI processes and the overall complexity of the portal CRM.

Spending about an hour on this fix, I started by researching the implications of increasing the heap size. I wanted to ensure that I wasn’t just putting a band-aid on a larger problem. I learned that the heap is where JavaScript manages memory for dynamic data. If it runs out, it can cause the entire build process to crash, which is exactly what had been happening. With the new heap size of 8192MB, I was confident that I could avoid these out-of-memory issues moving forward.

After making the necessary adjustments, I redeployed the application and monitored the build process closely. It was a relief to see that the builds completed successfully without any out-of-memory errors. I also took the time to validate that the .next files were created correctly and served the expected content. This was a small but critical step in ensuring that users wouldn't encounter dead homepages, which is something I want to avoid at all costs.

Reflecting on this experience, I’m reminded of the challenges of building this project solo. I often rely on AI tools, like Claude Code in VS Code, to help me navigate these technical hurdles. The ability to troubleshoot and implement fixes quickly is essential when you’re running a one-man show. While I could have opted for a more collaborative environment with tools like Lovable or Cursor, I find that working independently with AI gives me the flexibility to innovate at my own pace. Plus, it's a testament to my ambition of building a billion-dollar company without the overhead of a large team.

As I continue to refine the deployment process, I’ll keep this fix in mind as a stepping stone toward more robust builds. I’m excited about the future of the agentic web and the potential it has for transforming how users interact with digital content. Each fix like this not only improves the stability of the platform but also brings me one step closer to realizing my vision for a fully functional, scalable spatial AI portal.

In summary, today’s fix was about more than just raising the build heap ceiling; it was about ensuring that the foundation of my project remains solid as I push forward. Each hour spent fixing bugs is an investment in the long-term success of the platform, and I’m committed to seeing it through. I’m looking forward to tackling the next challenge and sharing those experiences as I continue to build in public.

Terms in this entryGEO PortalTool / Tool call

← Back to the full build journal